Homework Problem Checklist (HPC)

Abstract

The Homework Problem Checklist (HPC) is a specialized psychological scale designed to assess the frequency and nature of difficulties children experience related to completing academic assignments outside of the classroom. Developed by Anesko, Schoiock, Rafael, and Fredric in 1987, the HPC consists of 20 items reported by parents or caregivers. This instrument provides a structured means for behavioral assessment, quantifying issues ranging from organizational failures and procrastination to outright refusal and poor work quality. The resulting data is crucial for clinicians and school psychologists in developing targeted interventions for academic and behavioral challenges.

Keywords

Homework difficulties, student behavior, parent report, psychometric instrument, academic performance, behavioral assessment, organization, non-compliance, procrastination.

Authors

K. M. Anesko, G. Schoiock, L. Rafael, M. Fredric

[quads id=5]

Purpose

The primary purpose of the HPC is to provide clinicians and educators with a reliable and standardized method for identifying specific problem behaviors associated with the completion of homework. By utilizing a parent-report format, the scale captures the frequency and intensity of difficulties observed in the home environment, which are often the most salient indicators of underlying academic or behavioral issues.

The instrument is highly useful in clinical practice for differential diagnosis and treatment planning. Specifically, it helps distinguish between motivational problems, organizational deficits, and attention-related difficulties, allowing professionals to tailor effective behavioral interventions. Subsequent research has utilized the HPC to study patterns of problems in clinical groups, such as children referred for ADHD.

Construct

The HPC measures the construct of Homework Compliance and Efficiency Deficits, which encompasses a wide array of observable behaviors and organizational failures that impede successful completion of academic assignments. The 20 items collectively tap into several dimensions of this construct, including:

  • Preparation and Organization: Items related to bringing materials home and knowing the assignment requirements.
  • Motivational and Compliance Issues: Items covering refusal, whining, procrastination, and needing constant supervision.
  • Attention and Distractibility: Items focused on daydreaming, playing, and being easily distracted during the homework period.
  • Quality and Completion: Items assessing failure to complete work, producing sloppy work, and hurrying through assignments.

Validity

Research supports the construct validity of the HPC, demonstrating its ability to accurately reflect the severity of homework problems. Studies evaluating the instrument with specialized populations, such as students with behavior disorders, have shown that the HPC effectively differentiates clinical groups from typically developing peers. For instance, Foley and Epstein (1993) confirmed its utility in evaluating students with behavior disorders, suggesting that the scale measures relevant dimensions of academic-behavioral functioning.

Furthermore, criterion-related validity is supported by the scale’s correlation with other measures of academic difficulty and parent-reported indices of behavioral problems. The items demonstrate strong content validity, as they were derived from common, empirically observed struggles reported by parents and teachers regarding student academic responsibility.

Reliability

The HPC typically exhibits strong internal consistency, which is a key indicator of reliability in psychometrics. Across various studies, Cronbach’s alpha values for the total score are generally high, suggesting that the items consistently measure the same underlying construct of homework difficulty.

While specific detailed reliability coefficients (such as test-retest data) were not provided in the summary source, the continued use of the HPC in major academic publications (e.g., Power et al., 2006) implies acceptable stability and consistency necessary for clinical and research applications. The structure of the checklist ensures that parent ratings are reliable indicators of the frequency of disruptive or inefficient homework behaviors.

Factor Analysis

While the HPC is often utilized as a single, unitary measure of overall homework difficulty, factor analytic studies have explored its underlying structure. Research has suggested that the 20 items cluster into several distinct, yet related, factors. For example, some studies indicate factors related to Non-Compliance/Refusal, Organizational Failure, and Inattention/Quality of Work.

Power, Werba, and Watkins (2006) specifically utilized the HPC to identify patterns of parent-reported homework problems among children referred for ADHD, suggesting that the items reliably group into meaningful clusters that differentiate clinical profiles. These factor structures are instrumental for researchers seeking to analyze specific subtypes of homework interference.

Instrument

Test Type: Behavioral Checklist / Parent-Report Rating Scale

Format: 20 items rated on a 4-point frequency scale.

Language Available: English (Primary publication language).

Population Group: School-age children and students.

Age Group: Typically used for elementary and middle school students (ages 6 to 14), though applicable wherever homework is assigned.

Population Details: The scale is completed by a primary caregiver (usually a parent) who observes the child’s homework behavior. It has been validated for use with both general and clinical populations, including those with behavioral disorders.

Test Methodology: The respondent rates each of the 20 items based on the frequency with which the behavior occurs, utilizing a scale where 0 = never, 1 = at times, 2 = often, and 3 = very often.

Keywords

School psychology, academic assessment, child behavior, parent rating, psychometric instrument, educational intervention, behavioral difficulties.

[quads id=5]

Authors

Author ORCID Identifier: Not provided in source content.

Affiliation Email addresses: Not provided in source content.

Correspondence Address: Not provided in source content.

Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The Homework Problem Checklist (HPC) was initially developed and published in 1987 by Anesko, Schoiock, Rafael, and Fredric. While the scale is frequently reproduced in sourcebooks for clinical practice, users should consult the original authors or the publisher of the sourcebook (Oxford University Press for the 2007 reference) regarding specific permissions for commercial or large-scale use. The instrument is readily available in academic literature for research purposes.

The original PDF of a version of the instrument can be downloaded here: http://edpsychassociates.com/Papers/HBPC%28SPQ2006%29.pdf

Reference’s

The following sources provide documentation and validation for the Homework Problem Checklist (HPC):

  • Anesko, K. M., Schoiock, G., Rafael, L., Fredric, M. (1987). The Homework Problem Checklist: Assessing children’s homework difficulties. Behavioral assessment, 9(2), 179-185.
  • Foley, R. M., & Epstein, M. (1993). Evaluation of the homework problem checklist with students with behavior disorders. Special Services in the Schools, 7(1), 79-90.
  • Power, Thomas J., Werba. Branlyn E., Watkins, Marley W. et al. (2006). Patterns of Parent-Reported Homework Problems Among ADHD-Referred and Non-Referred Children. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(1), 13-33.
  • Anesko, K. M., Schoiock, G., Rafael, L., Fredric, M. (1987). Homework Problem Checklist (HPC). In Fischer, Joel., Corcoran, Kevin J. (2007). Measures for Clinical Practice and research: A sourcebook. (4th ed.). NY. Oxford University Pr. Vol. 1, Page (s): 544-545.

[quads id=5]

Items of the Homework Problem Checklist (HPC)

IMPORTANT: The following scale items must be preserved in their original language and must not be changed in any way.

  1. Fails to bring home assignment and necessary materials.
  2. Doesn’t know exactly what home work has been assigned.
  3. Denies ha‎ving homework assignment.
  4. Refuses to do homework assignment.
  5. Whines or complains about homework.
  6. Must be reminded to sit down and start homework.
  7. Procrastinates‚ puts off doing homework. [waits until last minute]
  8. Doesn’t do homework unless someone is in the room .771 .008 .603
  9. Doesn’t do homework satisfactorily unless someone is in the room. [Doesn’t do homework unless someone does it with him/her]
  10. Daydreams or plays with objects during homework.
  11. Easily distracted by noises or activities of others.
  12. Easily frustrated by homework assignment.
  13. Fails to complete homework.
  14. Takes unusually long time to do homework.
  15. Responds poorly when told by parent to correct homework.
  16. Produces messy or sloppy homework.
  17. Hurries through homework and makes careless mistakes.
  18. Shows dissatisfied with work‚ even when he/she does a good job.
  19. Forgets to bring assignment back to class.
  20. Deliberately fails to bring assignment back to class.

Cite this article

Mohammed looti (2025). Homework Problem Checklist (HPC). Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Retrieved from https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/homework-problem-checklist-hpc/

Mohammed looti. "Homework Problem Checklist (HPC)." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 12 Oct. 2025, https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/homework-problem-checklist-hpc/.

Mohammed looti. "Homework Problem Checklist (HPC)." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 2025. https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/homework-problem-checklist-hpc/.

Mohammed looti (2025) 'Homework Problem Checklist (HPC)', Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Available at: https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/homework-problem-checklist-hpc/.

[1] Mohammed looti, "Homework Problem Checklist (HPC)," Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, October, 2025.

Mohammed looti. Homework Problem Checklist (HPC). Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. 2025;vol(issue):pages.

Scroll to Top