Table of Contents
Abstract
The Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) is a widely utilized, multi-rater psychological scale developed by Gresham and Elliot (1990). It is designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of a child’s social behaviors, including both positive social skills and maladaptive problem behaviors, as well as academic competence. The system employs three distinct forms—Child (SSRS-C), Teacher (SSRS-T), and Parent (SSRS-P)—to gather data from multiple informants across various ecological settings (school and home), enhancing the reliability and validity of the findings regarding the student’s overall functioning.
The scale measures social skills across core domains such as Cooperation, Assertion, and Self-control. Unique to the SSRS is its dual-rating format on many items, requiring informants to rate both the frequency of a behavior (How Often?) and the perceived importance of that behavior for development or relationships (How Important?). This approach helps identify crucial areas for intervention by highlighting behaviors that are both infrequent and highly valued by the rater.
Keywords
Social Skills Rating System, SSRS, Social skills, Problem Behaviors, Academic Competence, Child Assessment, Behavior rating scale, Cooperation, Assertion, Self-control, Multi-rater.
Authors
Frank M. Gresham, Stephen N. Elliot, F. Black (cited in related research).
Purpose
The primary purpose of the SSRS is to identify children and adolescents who may be at risk due to deficits in social skills or excesses in maladaptive behaviors. By providing a standardized assessment of social competence, the SSRS aids school psychologists, educators, and clinicians in making eligibility decisions, developing individualized education programs (IEPs), and designing targeted behavioral interventions.
The inclusion of teacher, parent, and self-report forms allows for the comparison of behavior across different environments, highlighting potential discrepancies in how a child is perceived at home versus at school. This ecological perspective is vital for creating effective intervention strategies that generalize across settings.
Construct
The SSRS measures three broad psychological constructs: Social Skills, Problem Behaviors, and Academic Competence.
- Social Skills: This domain assesses positive social interactions, typically broken down into:
- Cooperation: Behaviors related to following rules, sharing, helping others, and compliance.
- Assertion: Behaviors related to initiating social interactions, responding appropriately to peer pressure, and expressing needs or feelings.
- Self-control: Behaviors related to managing emotional responses, controlling temper in conflict, and responding appropriately to criticism.
- Problem Behaviors: This domain focuses on maladaptive behaviors that interfere with social and academic functioning. These are often divided into externalizing behaviors (e.g., fighting, arguing, temper tantrums) and internalizing behaviors (e.g., anxiety, depression, loneliness).
- Academic Competence: This construct, assessed exclusively by the teacher, evaluates the student’s academic performance and related learning behaviors (e.g., motivation, organization, reading/math skills) relative to their classroom peers.
Validity
The SSRS demonstrates strong evidence of psychometric soundness, particularly regarding its construct and content validity. Content validity was established by ensuring items were representative of critical social skills domains relevant to school and home environments. Construct validity is supported by factor analytic studies confirming the distinct factors of Cooperation, Assertion, and Self-control, as well as the differentiation between positive social skills and negative problem behaviors.
The scale has been shown to correlate meaningfully with other measures of behavioral adjustment and academic performance, providing evidence of adequate criterion-related validity. Furthermore, the ability of the SSRS to differentiate between clinical and non-clinical populations, such as mainstreamed mildly retarded and non-handicapped children (Gresham, Elliot, & Black, 1987), supports its practical utility in diagnostic and placement decisions.
Reliability
The reliability of the SSRS is typically reported as high, indicating consistency and stability of measurement. Studies evaluating internal consistency, often using coefficient alpha, generally yield robust results, particularly for the Teacher and Parent forms across the main subscales (Social Skills and Problem Behaviors). These high reliability estimates suggest that the items within each subscale measure the intended construct consistently.
Test-retest reliability is also strong, supporting the stability of scores over short intervals, which is important for monitoring student progress over a school year. For instance, cross-cultural studies, such as research on the reliability of the scale in a group of Iranian children (Shahim, 2001), have also confirmed acceptable reliability, suggesting the instrument’s robustness in diverse cultural contexts.
Factor Analysis
Factor analytic studies conducted during the development and subsequent validation of the SSRS generally confirm the underlying structure proposed by the authors. For the Social Skills subscale, factor analysis consistently identifies three distinct, yet correlated, factors: Cooperation, Assertion, and Self-control. This distinction is critical because it allows interventions to be specifically tailored to the area of deficit rather than relying on a generalized social skill score.
The Problem Behavior scale also typically yields factors corresponding to internalizing (anxiety, depression) and externalizing (aggression, hyperactivity) behaviors. The Teacher form’s Academic Competence scale stands as a separate, unitary factor, reflecting the student’s overall academic adjustment and performance relative to their peers.
Instrument
Test Type: Standardized assessment, Multi-rater Behavior Rating Scale.
Format: Paper-and-pencil, utilizing both self-report (SSRS-C) and informant-report (SSRS-T, SSRS-P) measures. Items require rating of frequency and importance.
Language Available: English (Original), with documented translations and adaptations in various languages globally.
Population Group: Children and Adolescents.
Age Group: Typically ranges from Preschool (age 3) through High School (age 18), depending on the specific form utilized.
Population Details: Applicable for use with the general population, as well as clinical and special education populations, including those identified with mild intellectual disability or behavioral challenges.
Test Methodology: Raters use a 3-point Likert scale (0=Never, 1=Sometimes, 2=Very Often) to score behavioral frequency. For the social skills sections, a separate 3-point scale is used to rate importance (0=Not Important, 1=Important, 2/3=Critical). The SSRS-T includes a separate 5-point normative comparison scale for Academic Competence.
Keywords
Behavioral assessment, Child psychology, School psychology, Cooperation, Assertion, Self-control, Multi-informant, Standardized assessment, Behavioral intervention.
Authors
Author ORCID Identifier: N/A (Information not provided in source).
Affiliation Email addresses: N/A (Information not provided in source).
Correspondence Address: N/A (Information not provided in source).
Permissions & Fee and Test Year
The Social Skills Rating System manual was originally published in 1990 by American Guidance Service (AGS), now part of Pearson Education. This instrument is proprietary, and formal administration and scoring require the purchase of materials (manuals and forms) from the publisher, adhering to their current fee structure and professional qualification requirements.
The original PDF of the instrument, potentially for illustrative or research purposes, can be downloaded here: http://overlake.virtual-space.net/SLP/SSRS_locked.pdf
Reference’s
Gresham‚ F. M.‚ & Elliot‚ S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines‚ MN: American Guidance Service.
Gresham‚ F. M.‚ Elliot‚ S. N.‚ & Black‚ F. (1987). Teacher-rated social skills of mainstreamed mildly retarded and non-handicapped children. School Psychology Review‚ 17‚ 78–88.
Shahim S. Reliability of the social skills rating system in a group of Iranian children. Psychol Rep 2001; 89(3): 566-70.
Items of the Social skills rating system (SSRS) – Children‚ Teacher and Parent version
IMPORTANT: The following scale items must be preserved in their original language and must not be changed in any way.
Cite this article
Mohammed looti (2025). Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) – Children, Teacher, and Parent Version. Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Retrieved from https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/social-skills-rating-system-ssrs-children-teacher-and-parent-version-2/
Mohammed looti. "Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) – Children, Teacher, and Parent Version." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 12 Oct. 2025, https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/social-skills-rating-system-ssrs-children-teacher-and-parent-version-2/.
Mohammed looti. "Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) – Children, Teacher, and Parent Version." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 2025. https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/social-skills-rating-system-ssrs-children-teacher-and-parent-version-2/.
Mohammed looti (2025) 'Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) – Children, Teacher, and Parent Version', Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Available at: https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/social-skills-rating-system-ssrs-children-teacher-and-parent-version-2/.
[1] Mohammed looti, "Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) – Children, Teacher, and Parent Version," Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, October, 2025.
Mohammed looti. Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) – Children, Teacher, and Parent Version. Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. 2025;vol(issue):pages.