Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)

Abstract

The Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI) is an ultra-brief instrument designed to assess the Big Five personality domains using only two items per dimension. Developed by Gosling, Rentfrow, and Swann (2003), the TIPI was created to provide a quick, efficient, and psychometrically sound alternative to longer measures of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) in situations where time or space constraints are critical, such as large-scale surveys or field research. Despite its brevity, the TIPI demonstrates acceptable convergent and discriminant validity when compared to comprehensive Big Five instruments, making it a highly effective tool for rapid personality screening.

Keywords

TIPI, Ten Item Personality Measure, Big Five, Five-Factor Model, FFM, personality assessment, ultra-brief scale, psychometrics, Likert scale.

Authors

Samuel D. Gosling, Peter J. Rentfrow, William B. Swann, Jr.

[quads id=5]

Purpose

The primary purpose of the TIPI is to provide a highly economical and rapid assessment of the five major dimensions of human personality. It is specifically intended for research settings where participant fatigue is a concern or where personality assessment must be integrated into a larger battery of measures, requiring minimal administration time. The scale allows researchers to capture the core variance of the Big Five structure without sacrificing excessive time or resources.

The scale aims to strike a necessary balance between measurement efficiency and adequate psychometric properties. It is particularly useful for studies requiring repeated measures, large population screening, or online data collection where respondent dropout is a major risk. Each of the five domains is measured using a pair of descriptive traits, one positively keyed and one negatively keyed (reverse-scored), maximizing information capture within the constraint of ten total items.

Construct

The TIPI measures the universally accepted structure of personality known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM) or the Big Five. This model posits that personality can be comprehensively described by five broad traits, often remembered by the acronym OCEAN or CANOE. The TIPI assesses these five dimensions:

• Openness to Experience: Reflects imagination, intellect, and creativity.
• Conscientiousness: Reflects organization, reliability, and self-discipline.
• Extraversion: Reflects sociability, assertiveness, and enthusiasm.
• Agreeableness: Reflects compassion, cooperativeness, and warmth.
• Emotional Stability (Inverse of Neuroticism): Reflects calmness and resilience against anxiety and stress.

Each dimension is operationalized through two opposing trait descriptors (e.g., Extraverted, enthusiastic vs. Reserved, quiet), requiring respondents to evaluate the extent to which these trait pairings apply to them using a 7-point Likert scale.

Validity

The validation study conducted by Gosling et al. (2003) focused heavily on establishing both convergent and discriminant validity against established, longer measures of the Big Five, such as the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Results indicated that the TIPI factors correlated highly with their corresponding domains on the longer instruments (high convergent validity), with coefficients typically ranging from 0.50 to 0.80 across the five domains.

Furthermore, the TIPI demonstrated acceptable discriminant validity, meaning that the measures of one factor showed low correlations with measures of unrelated factors, supporting the differentiation between the five dimensions. While the two-item structure inherently limits the breadth of domain coverage compared to comprehensive scales, the TIPI successfully captures the central, most salient aspects of each Big Five domain, establishing its utility as a valid proxy for comprehensive measures in brief research contexts.

Reliability

Due to the ultra-brief nature of the TIPI, traditional measures of internal consistency, such as Cronbach’s Alpha, are necessarily lower than those found in longer scales. The original study reported internal consistency coefficients generally ranging from 0.40 to 0.70. Researchers utilizing the TIPI must interpret this lower internal reliability within the context of the scale’s extreme brevity, acknowledging the trade-off between speed and internal measurement precision.

Despite low internal consistency, the TIPI demonstrates robust test-retest reliability across various time intervals (e.g., six weeks). This temporal stability suggests that, while the two items within a factor may not correlate perfectly, the factor score derived from them consistently measures the underlying trait over time. This temporal stability, alongside acceptable inter-rater reliability, affirms the scale’s reliability for tracking stable personality differences.

Factor Analysis

The structural integrity of the TIPI was examined using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. These analyses were crucial for verifying that the ten items grouped cleanly into the intended five orthogonal factors, consistent with the theoretical structure of the FFM. Although the constrained design (two items per factor) presents methodological challenges, the factor structure generally supported the hypothesized five dimensions.

The analysis confirmed that the chosen item pairings effectively represent the core of each Big Five trait, and the factor loadings were conceptually aligned with their target dimensions. Subsequent research across various cultures and languages has largely replicated this five-factor structure, affirming the generalizability of the TIPI and its utility in comparative personality research.

Instrument

Test Type: Self-report personality inventory

Format: Paper-and-pencil or online administration; 7-point Likert scale

Language Available: English (Original); widely translated into numerous languages including Spanish, German, Chinese, and others.

Population Group: General population

Age Group: Adolescents and Adults (typically 16 years and older)

Population Details: Used extensively in non-clinical research settings, large-scale epidemiological studies, and cross-cultural comparisons where measurement efficiency is paramount.

Test Methodology: Respondents rate themselves on ten pairs of opposing personality traits using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (Disagree strongly) to 7 (Agree strongly). Scoring involves reversing the scores for five items (6, 2, 8, 4, 10) and averaging the two items associated with each of the five factors.

Keywords

Personality inventory, FFM, Gosling, psychometric scale, brief measurement, cross-cultural research, self-report, factor analysis, psychometrics.

[quads id=5]

Authors

Author ORCID Identifier: Not specified.

Affiliation Email addresses: Not specified.

Correspondence Address: Not specified.

Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI) is considered a public-domain instrument and is generally available for free use in academic and non-commercial research. Users are required to cite the original source (Gosling et al., 2003) when utilizing the scale.

Test Year: 2003

Reference’s

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.

The original PDF for the validation study can be downloaded here: http://gosling.psy.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/JRP-03-tipi.pdf

Further information on the instrument is available at the developer’s website: http://gosling.psy.utexas.edu/scales-weve-developed/ten-item-personality-measure-tipi/

[quads id=5]

Items of the Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI)

IMPORTANT: The following scale items must be preserved in their original language and must not be changed in any way.

Here are a number of personality traits that may or may not apply to you. Please write a number next to each statement to indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with that statement. You should rate the extent to which the pair of traits applies to you, even if one characteristic applies more strongly than the other.

I see myself as:

1. _____ Extraverted, enthusiastic.
2. _____ Critical, quarrelsome.
3. _____ Dependable, self-disciplined.
4. _____ Anxious, easily upset.
5. _____ Open to new experiences, complex.
6. _____ Reserved, quiet.
7. _____ Sympathetic, warm.
8. _____ Disorganized, careless.
9. _____ Calm, emotionally stable.
10. _____ Conventional, uncreative.

1 = Disagree strongly, 2 = Disagree moderately, 3 = Disagree a little, 4 = Neither agree nor disagree, 5 = Agree a little, 6 = Agree moderately, 7 = Agree strongly

TIPI scale scoring (“R” denotes reverse-scored items):

Extraversion: 1, 6R; Agreeableness: 2R, 7; Conscientiousness; 3, 8R; Emotional Stability: 4R, 9; Openness to Experiences: 5, 10R.