Table of Contents
Abstract
The English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory (ELTRI), developed by Shirazizadeh and Abbaszadeh in 2023, is a robust 35-item psychological instrument specifically designed to quantify the resilience levels of English language teachers (ELT). The development of the ELTRI addressed a significant gap in the existing literature, which lacked a specialized resilience assessment tool tailored to the unique professional and contextual demands of foreign language teaching. The scale construction initiated with a pool of 44 items, generated through a combination of extensive interviews with Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers and a comprehensive review of established teacher resilience frameworks. Following pilot testing and subsequent statistical validation using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the inventory was refined into a stable five-factor model comprising 35 items. The authors provided robust evidence supporting the instrument’s content validity and strong internal consistency.
Keywords
Teacher Resilience, English Language Teaching, EFL Teaching, Contextual Supports, Emotional Management, Internal Motivations, Pedagogical Skills, Social Skills, Educational Measures
Authors
Shirazizadeh, Mohsen; Abbaszadeh, Afsaneh
[quads id=5]
Purpose
The primary objective of the English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory (ELTRI) is to establish a psychometrically validated measure capable of assessing the multifaceted dimensions of resilience specifically among professionals engaged in teaching English as a foreign or second language.
The scale is intended to be used by researchers and educators to identify factors that enable English language teachers to cope effectively with job-related stressors and maintain their well-being and commitment, thereby addressing the specific demands of the EFL context where attrition rates can be high.
Construct
The core psychological construct measured by the ELTRI is Teacher Resilience. This construct encompasses the ability of English language teachers to effectively navigate and recover from professional challenges, stress, and adversity encountered within their teaching environment.
The finalized five-factor model suggests that teacher resilience in this context is multidimensional, incorporating elements such as contextual support, emotional regulation skills, and intrinsic motivation related to the teaching profession.
Validity
To establish the content validity of the ELTRI, the instrument underwent a meticulous expert review process. Four specialized experts in the field of EFL teacher education, all possessing profound knowledge of the resilience concept, thoroughly evaluated the inventory.
This expert evaluation focused critically on the appropriateness of the instrument’s overall content coverage, the clarity and precision of the individual item wording, and the general design and format of the inventory, ensuring that the items accurately represented the domain of teacher resilience within the language teaching context.
Reliability
The reliability of the ELTRI was primarily assessed through the lens of internal consistency, a crucial measure of how well the items within the instrument correlate with one another.
Initial calculations performed on the pilot version of the instrument yielded a reliability coefficient of 0.73. Following the refinement and reduction of items, the final 35-item scale was subjected to rigorous analysis using Cronbach’s alpha. This analysis resulted in a coefficient of 0.84, which is generally accepted in psychometrics as indicating a good and acceptable level of internal consistency for the final measurement tool.
Factor Analysis
The development process involved extensive Factor Analysis (FA) to determine the underlying structure of the resilience construct. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was initially conducted on the preliminary pool of 43 items, identifying 13 factors with eigenvalues exceeding one, which collectively accounted for 64% of the total variance.
A subsequent parallel analysis provided clearer guidance, suggesting that only the first five eigenvalues surpassed the established criterion for factor retention. Based on the inspection of the scree plot and the results from the parallel analysis, the researchers decided to retain a five-factor solution for further statistical confirmation.
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was then performed utilizing principal axis factoring with a Varimax rotation. The final CFA confirmed the hypothesized five-factor model, which successfully explained 40.6% of the total variance. During this phase, items exhibiting factor loadings below the 0.40 threshold were systematically eliminated, resulting in the finalized, robust 35-item inventory.
Instrument
Test Type: Original instrument developed for a specific population and context.
Format: The instrument is a self-report inventory/questionnaire consisting of 35 items. Responses are gathered using a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 6 (“strongly agree”).
Language Available: English
Population Group: Male; Female
Age Group: Adulthood (18 years and older)
Population Details: The measure was developed and validated using a sample of English Language Teachers located in Iran, focusing on the cultural and professional context of Iranian education.
Test Methodology: The validation process encompassed several advanced psychometric methodologies: Test Validity assessment (Content Validity), Test Reliability evaluation (Internal Consistency via Cronbach’s alpha), and extensive Factor Analysis (Exploratory and Confirmatory). The instrument is suitable for administration in either Electronic or Paper format.
Keywords
Contextual Supports, Educational Measures, Emotional Management, Employee Skills, English as a Foreign Language Teaching, Foreign Language Education, Intrinsic Motivation, Teacher Attitudes, Psychological Measurement
[quads id=5]
Authors
Shirazizadeh, Mohsen
Author ORCID Identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1880-1036
Affiliation: Alzahra University, Department of English
Affiliation Email addresses: [email protected]
Correspondence Address: [email protected]
Abbaszadeh, Afsaneh
Author ORCID Identifier: No data is Available
Affiliation: Tarbiat Modares University, Department of English Language Teaching
Affiliation Email addresses: No data is Available
Correspondence Address: No data is Available
Permissions & Fee and Test Year
Permissions: Contact Publisher
Fee: No
Commercial: No
Test Year: 2023
Reference’s
Shirazizadeh, M., & Abbaszadeh, A. (2023). EFL teacher resilience: Instrument development and validation. Reflective Practice, 24(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2200926
[quads id=5]
Items of the English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory
IMPORTANT: The following scale items must be preserved in their original language and must not be changed in any way.
The 35 items that constitute this inventory are available for review. They can be found in the source publication referenced above, specifically within Appendix B on pages 387-388 of the article.
Dear respondent,
This questionnaire aims at looking into your actual teaching practices as an English teacher. Your careful completion of the questionnaire will definitely contribute to real data and is greatly appreciated. Please check the box which best describes your perceptions about your job as an English teacher. The information will be kept confidential and will be used just for research purposes.
Thank you very much in advance for your time and kind cooperation.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements using the scale provided.
Response Scale: 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Moderately Disagree, 4: Moderately Agree, 5: Agree, 6: Strongly Agree.
| Items | Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Moderately Disagree | Moderately Agree | Agree | Strongly Agree |
| (1) I am optimistic about my future as an English teacher. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (2) I care for the students’ satisfaction with my class and I feel good if the students are satisfied and happy in my class. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (3) I will see a bright future for myself as a teacher, full of successes in my job. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (4) I get disappointed when students are not motivated to study English. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (5) I get disappointed with my students’ disruptive behavior in class. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (6) I regard myself as effective in my students’ lives and for society. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (7) I get disappointed by my workplace’s strict rules. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (8) I try to improve my teaching by reflecting on my strengths and weaknesses. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (9) I am not satisfied with my salary. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (10) The out of datebooks and materials that I have to teach make me disappointed. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (11) I have a friendly relationship with my colleagues. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (12) I do not ask my colleagues for help with my teaching problems because I think they may consider me an incompetent teacher. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (13) I am confident that I can manage difficult relationships with my colleagues in my workplace. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (14) I will stay in my job because I love teaching. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (15) I am highly confident of my ability to teach my students something they do not know. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (16) When I face any challenges in my workplace I do not give up and try to solve them. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (17) I am unable to adapt myself to my students’ culture. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (18) I like teaching because I can communicate with other people. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (19) I will get disappointed if my students do not take my class and learn English seriously. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (20) I ask my close friends to help me with my teaching problems. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (21) I will stay in my job because I love my students. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (22) I am unable to deal with variations in my classroom (e.g. different learning styles, various expectations of the class). | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (23) I try to improve my teaching performance by participating in discussions with my colleagues or some more experienced teachers. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (24) I cannot create a balance between my work and my personal life. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (25) I ask my family for advice when I face teaching problems such as problems in classroom management. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (26) I am rewarded by my manager (by receiving positive feedback, payment rise …) for the efforts I put into my job. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (27) I am highly confident of my ability to help my students achieve their educational goal (e.g. getting accepted in examinations). | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (28) I do not have access to all the resources (tape recorder/CD player, T.V …) that I need for my class. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (29) I try to improve the quality of my teaching through different ways, e.g. searching the internet, reading books, and attending conferences and workshops. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (30) I try to motivate my students to learn everything, not only English. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (31) If I feel that my students do not like a part of a lesson I will change it based on their needs. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (32) I do not think of stopping teaching. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (33) When I am tired, I go to my colleagues to get energy and support. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (34) My workplace’s policies require me to practice a teaching methodology that is different from what I think is a fruitful methodology in language teaching. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| (35) I try to prepare my students for their life in the future by talking about my own experiences. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Cite this article
Mohammed looti (2025). English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory. Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Retrieved from https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/english-language-teachers-resilience-inventory/
Mohammed looti. "English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 31 Oct. 2025, https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/english-language-teachers-resilience-inventory/.
Mohammed looti. "English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 2025. https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/english-language-teachers-resilience-inventory/.
Mohammed looti (2025) 'English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory', Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Available at: https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/english-language-teachers-resilience-inventory/.
[1] Mohammed looti, "English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory," Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, October, 2025.
Mohammed looti. English Language Teachers Resilience Inventory. Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. 2025;vol(issue):pages.