Table of Contents
Abstract
The Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA) is a widely utilized instrument designed to measure the degree of acculturation among individuals of Asian descent residing in Western societies, primarily the United States. Developed by Richard M. Suinn, this scale moves beyond simple generational status to assess behavioral, cognitive, and affective components of cultural identity and adaptation. It is a critical tool in psychological research, particularly for understanding mental health disparities and cultural competence in clinical settings involving the Asian American population.
Keywords
Acculturation, Asian American, cultural identity, psychological scale, self-identity, biculturalism, psychometrics, Richard M. Suinn.
Authors
Richard M. Suinn, Ph.D.
Purpose
The primary purpose of the Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA) is to provide a reliable and comprehensive measure of an individual’s level of acculturation to Western (specifically American) culture, while simultaneously assessing retention of traditional Asian cultural identity. It was developed to address limitations in earlier measures that often relied solely on demographic data, such as generation status, by incorporating behavioral and cognitive dimensions.
The scale aids researchers and clinicians in understanding how cultural adaptation influences various outcomes, including mental health, academic performance, and social adjustment among Asian Americans. By quantifying the degree of adherence to traditional Asian customs and immersion in American culture, the SL-ASIA facilitates culturally sensitive research and practice.
Construct
The SL-ASIA measures the complex, multidimensional construct of acculturation, defined as the process of cultural and psychological change that results from the contact between two or more cultures. Specifically, it focuses on Asian American identity, assessing the degree to which an individual has adopted American cultural norms, values, and behaviors, and retained their heritage culture.
The scale operationalizes acculturation across several key domains, including language usage and preference, social affiliation (friendship and community association), cultural consumption (media and food), self-identity and ethnic pride, and adherence to cultural values. Scores typically range along a continuum, often reflecting a transition from traditional Asian identity to a more assimilated American identity, with intermediate scores suggesting bicultural adaptation.
Validity
The SL-ASIA has demonstrated substantial psychometric properties, supporting its validity across various Asian subgroups. Early validation studies established strong concurrent validity by correlating SL-ASIA scores with other measures of cultural orientation and demographic variables known to influence acculturation, such as generation level and age of immigration.
Content validity is supported by the comprehensive nature of the items, which cover multiple behavioral and cognitive aspects hypothesized to constitute acculturation. Furthermore, criterion validity has been established through the scale’s ability to predict differences in psychological outcomes, cognitive styles, and health behaviors based on acculturation level among diverse Asian American populations.
Reliability
The SL-ASIA generally exhibits high internal consistency, indicating that its items reliably measure the underlying construct of acculturation. Studies using Cronbach’s alpha typically report coefficients ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 across various samples of Asian American participants, suggesting excellent reliability.
Test-retest reliability is also strong, confirming the stability of the acculturation measurement over time. This high reliability makes the SL-ASIA a trustworthy instrument for both cross-sectional research and longitudinal studies tracking cultural adaptation processes.
Factor Analysis
While the SL-ASIA is often scored as a single, unitary measure of acculturation (a continuous score ranging from 1.0 to 5.0), various studies employing factor analysis have explored its underlying structure. Initial analyses often suggest a primary factor that accounts for a significant portion of the variance, confirming the unidimensional nature of general acculturation measured by the scale.
However, more nuanced confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses sometimes reveal sub-factors corresponding to specific domains, such as Language and Media Usage, Social Affiliation, and Cultural Identity/Values. Despite these sub-factors, the scale is most commonly and effectively utilized in research settings by calculating the total mean score, which represents the overall level of Western adaptation.
Instrument
Test Type: Psychological Test; Self-report measure of acculturation.
Format: 26 items, typically utilizing a 5-point Likert-type scale or multiple-choice response options, where lower scores indicate greater adherence to Asian culture and higher scores indicate greater assimilation into American culture.
Language Available: Primarily English, though translations have been used in research settings.
Population Group: Individuals of Asian descent residing in Western countries (primarily Asian Americans).
Age Group: Adolescents and Adults (typically used with college students and general adult populations).
Population Details: The scale is designed to be applicable across various Asian ethnic subgroups (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipino Americans).
Test Methodology: Pen-and-paper or digital self-administration. Scoring involves calculating the mean score of the 20 core items (Items 1-11, 13-21, 24, 25) or all 26 items, depending on the specific research application.
Keywords
Cultural adaptation, ethnic identity, psychological measurement, social association, language preference, bicultural, Richard M. Suinn.
Authors
Author ORCID Identifier: Not available/Provided.
Affiliation Email addresses: Not available/Provided.
Correspondence Address: Richard M. Suinn, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University (Historical Affiliation).
Permissions & Fee and Test Year
The scale was initially developed and published in the 1980s (often cited from 1987). It is generally considered available for non-commercial academic research use, though users should confirm current licensing requirements directly with the author or relevant academic publications. Formal fees for academic use are typically low or waived, but specific permissions are required for commercial applications.
Reference’s
N.-H. Trinh et al. (eds.)‚ Handbook of Mental Health and Acculturation in Asian American Families‚ Current Clinical Psychiatry‚ DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-437-1_12‚ _ Humana Press‚ a part of Springer Science Business Media‚ LLC 2009.
Items of the Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA)
IMPORTANT: The following scale items must be preserved in their original language and must not be changed in any way.
1. Asian only (e.g.‚ Chinese‚ Japanese‚ Korean‚ Vietnamese‚ etc.).2. Mostly Asian‚ some English.3. Asian and English about equally well (bilingual).4. Mostly English‚ some Asian.5. Only English.
1. Asian only (e.g.‚ Chinese‚ Japanese‚ Korean‚ Vietnamese‚ etc.).2. Mostly Asian‚ some English.3. Asian and English about equally well (bilingual).4. Mostly English‚ some Asian.5. Only English.
1. Oriental2. Asian3. Asian American4. Chinese American‚ Japanese American‚ Korean American‚ etc.5. American
1. Oriental2. Asian3. Asian American4. Chinese American‚ Japanese American‚ Korean American‚ etc.5. American
1. Oriental2. Asian3. Asian American4. Chinese American‚ Japanese American‚ Korean American‚ etc.5. American
1. Almost exclusively Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.2. Mostly Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.3. About equally Asian groups and Anglo groups.4. Mostly Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.5. Almost exclusively Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.
1. Almost exclusively Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.2. Mostly Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.3. About equally Asian groups and Anglo groups.4. Mostly Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.5. Almost exclusively Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.
1. Almost exclusively Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.2. Mostly Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.3. About equally Asian groups and Anglo groups.4. Mostly Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnicgroups.5. Almost exclusively Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.
1. Almost exclusively Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.2. Mostly Asians‚ Asian Americans‚ Orientals.3. About equally Asian groups and Anglo groups.4. Mostly Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.5. Almost exclusively Anglos‚ Blacks‚ Hispanics‚ or other non-Asian ethnic groups.
1. Only Asian music (e.g.‚ Chinese‚ Japanese‚ Korean‚ Vietnamese)2. Mostly Asian3. Equally Asian and English4. Mostly English5. English only
1. Asian-language movies only2. Asian-language movies mostly3. Equally Asian and English English-language movies4. Mostly English-language movies only5. English-language movies only
1. First generation =I was born in Asia or country other than the United States2. Second generation=I was born in the United States‚ either parent was born in Asia or country other than the United States3. Third generation = I was born in the United States‚ both parents were born in the United States‚ and all grandparents born in Asia or country other than the United States4. Fourth generation=I was born in the United States‚ both parents were born in the United States‚ and at least one grandparent born in Asia or country other than the United States and one grandparent born in the United States5. Fifth generation = I was born in the United States‚ both parents were born in the United States‚ and all grandparents also born in the United States6. Don’t know what generation best fits since I lack some information.
1. In Asia only2. Mostly in Asia‚ some in the United States3. Equally in Asia and the United States4. Mostly in the United States‚ some in Asia5. In the United States only
1. Raised 1 year or more in Asia2. Lived for less than 1 year in Asia3. Occasional visits to Asia4. Occasional communications (letters‚ phone calls‚ etc.) with people in Asia5. No exposure or communications with people in Asia
1. Exclusively Asian food2. Mostly Asian food‚ some American3. About equally Asian and American4. Mostly American food5. Exclusively American food
1. Exclusively Asian food2. Mostly Asian food‚ some American3. About equally Asian and American4. Mostly American food5. Exclusively American food
1. read only an Asian language;2. read an Asian language better than English;3. read both Asian and English equally well;4. read English better than an Asian language; and5. read only English.
1. write only an Asian language;2. write an Asian language better than English;3. write both Asian and English equally well;4. write English better than an Asian language; and5. write only English.
1. Extremely proud2. Moderately proud3. Little proud4. No pride but do not feel negative toward group5. No pride but do feel negative toward group
1. Very Asian2. Mostly Asian3. Bicultural4. Mostly Westernized5. Very Westernized
1. Nearly all2. Most of them3. Some of them4. A few of them5. None at all
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
do not believe | strongly believe in Asian values |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
do not believe | strongly believe in Asian values |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
do not fit | fit very well |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
do not fit | fit very well |
1. I consider myself basically an Asian person (e.g.‚ Chinese‚ Japanese‚ Korean‚ Vietnamese). Even though I live and work in America‚ I still view myself basically as an Asian person.2. I consider myself basically as an American. Even though I have an Asian background and characteristics‚ I still view myself basically as an American.3. I consider myself as an Asian American‚ although deep down I always know I am an Asian.4. I consider myself as an Asian American‚ although deep down I view myself as an American first.5. I consider myself as an Asian American. I have both Asian and American characteristics‚ and I view myself as a blend of both.
Cite this article
Mohammed looti (2025). Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA). Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Retrieved from https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/suinn-lew-asian-self-identity-acculturation-scale-sl-asia-2/
Mohammed looti. "Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA)." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 17 Oct. 2025, https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/suinn-lew-asian-self-identity-acculturation-scale-sl-asia-2/.
Mohammed looti. "Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA)." Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, 2025. https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/suinn-lew-asian-self-identity-acculturation-scale-sl-asia-2/.
Mohammed looti (2025) 'Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA)', Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. Available at: https://db.arabpsychology.com/scales/suinn-lew-asian-self-identity-acculturation-scale-sl-asia-2/.
[1] Mohammed looti, "Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA)," Psychological Scales & Instruments Database, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, October, 2025.
Mohammed looti. Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA). Psychological Scales & Instruments Database. 2025;vol(issue):pages.