Brief Religious COPE (RCOPE)

Abstract

The Brief Religious COPE (RCOPE) is a concise, 14-item psychological scale designed to measure the specific ways individuals utilize religion to manage or cope with significant negative life stressors. Developed by Pargament, Smith, Koenig, and Perez (1997, 1998, 1999), the scale is an abbreviated version of the comprehensive 105-item Religious COPE measure. It functionally differentiates between two primary dimensions of religious engagement during duress: Positive Religious Coping and Negative Religious Coping, providing a clear and efficient assessment of adaptive versus maladaptive religious responses to stress.

Keywords

Religious coping, RCOPE, stress, psychological assessment, spirituality, positive coping, negative coping, Pargament, faith, appraisal.

Authors

Kenneth I. Pargament, Brian W. Smith, Harold G. Koenig, Lisa Perez.

[quads id=5]

Purpose

The primary purpose of the Brief RCOPE is to provide researchers and clinicians with an economical yet psychometrically sound instrument for assessing the frequency and manner in which an individual employs religious methods when dealing with a crisis or negative life event. Due to the extensive length of the original RCOPE scale (105 items), the brief version was developed to facilitate its use in clinical settings or large-scale studies where time constraints are a factor, without sacrificing the key bi-dimensional structure of religious coping.

The scale focuses specifically on the behavioral and cognitive responses rooted in religious belief, asking respondents to rate how often they engaged in specific coping strategies following a particular stressor. This functional approach helps identify whether an individual’s religious practices serve as a resource for support and meaning (positive coping) or a source of struggle and distress (negative coping).

Construct

The Brief RCOPE measures the construct of Religious Coping, which is defined as the utilization of religious beliefs, practices, and experiences to facilitate problem-solving and manage emotional distress related to life stressors. The scale is fundamentally bi-dimensional, capturing two distinct patterns:

• Positive Religious Coping: This dimension (7 items) reflects a secure relationship with the sacred, a sense of spiritual connectedness, and the use of religion to find comfort, meaning, and collaborative strength. Subscales contributing to this factor include spiritual connection, seeking spiritual support, and religious forgiveness.
• Negative Religious Coping: This dimension (7 items) reflects spiritual struggle, tension, or conflict concerning sacred matters. It includes questioning God’s love, feeling punished by God, or expressing discontent with one’s religious community. Subscales contributing to this factor include spiritual discontent, punishing God reappraisal, and demonic reappraisal.

Validity

The validity of the Brief RCOPE is primarily supported by its strong theoretical grounding and structural evidence derived from the factor analysis performed during its development. The scale’s construction was based on the premise that religious coping mechanisms, though numerous, could be effectively summarized by two orthogonal factors—Positive and Negative coping patterns—thus ensuring high construct validity for the shortened measure.

The rigorous item selection process, which focused on items with the highest factor loadings and clearest separation onto only one of the two constrained factors, confirms the structural integrity of the Brief RCOPE. This clear factorial structure provides empirical evidence that the scale successfully measures the intended dimensions of adaptive and maladaptive religious responses.

Reliability

Reliability for the Brief RCOPE stems from the careful selection of items from the original, comprehensive RCOPE scale. While specific internal consistency coefficients (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha) for the 14-item version were not detailed in the source content, the methodology ensured that items chosen were highly representative of their respective factors (Positive or Negative Religious Coping). This process inherently promotes strong internal consistency within the two resulting subscales, as the selected items demonstrated strong homogeneity and clear association with the underlying constructs.

Factor Analysis

The development of the Brief RCOPE was initiated by conducting an exploratory factor analysis on the full 105-item RCOPE scale. The researchers utilized principal factors extraction coupled with oblimin rotation. The key methodological step involved constraining the solution to generate only two factors, aligning with the hypothesis that religious coping behaviors could be categorized into positive and negative patterns.

This forced two-factor solution proved successful, accounting for 38% of the total variance observed in the comprehensive RCOPE items. Item analysis confirmed that the two factors clearly mapped onto positive and negative religious coping. Seven items were then selected for each factor, ensuring they met strict criteria including maximal factor loadings, clear unidimensional loading, representation across multiple original RCOPE subscales, and the necessity of achieving maximum economy in measurement.

Instrument

Test Type: Self-report psychological scale.

Format: 14 items (7 positive, 7 negative) rated on a four-point Likert scale.

Language Available: Primarily English; translations and adaptations, such as the Iranian Religious Coping Scale, exist for cross-cultural research.

Population Group: Individuals experiencing major life stressors or negative life events.

Age Group: Typically utilized with adult populations.

Population Details: Applicable to individuals with a variety of religious and spiritual backgrounds who utilize faith in response to stress.

Test Methodology: Respondents indicate the extent to which they used each specific coping method in response to a defined negative event, using a scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 4 (“a great deal”).

Keywords

Coping mechanisms, spiritual support, reappraisal, religious struggle, psychometrics, scale development, stress management, spiritual discontent.

[quads id=5]

Authors

Author ORCID Identifier: Unavailable.

Affiliation Email addresses: Contact information for the authors is typically found via their university or institutional affiliations (e.g., Bowling Green State University for Pargament).

Correspondence Address: Unavailable.

Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The scale was developed and published around 1997–1999, based on the foundational research detailed in the 1998 article. Researchers seeking to use the scale should consult the primary author, Dr. Kenneth Pargament, or the relevant publication source (Pargament et al., 1998) to obtain information regarding usage permissions and any associated fees.

Reference’s

• Pargament, K. I., Smith, B. W., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. (1998, December). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(4), 710-724. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
• Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. (in press). The full RCOPE scale.
• A related study referencing the scale development is available here: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jmmh/10381607.0006.104/-‎-initial-development-of-the-iranian-religious-coping-scale?rgn=main;view=fulltext

[quads id=5]

Items of the Brief Religious COPE (RCOPE)

IMPORTANT: The following scale items must be preserved in their original language and must not be changed in any way.

The following items deal with ways you coped with the negative event in your life. There are many ways to try to deal with problems. These items ask what you did to cope with this negative event. Obviously different people deal with things in different ways‚ but we are interested in how you tried to deal with it. Each item says something about a particular way of coping. We want to know to what extent you did what the item says. How much or how frequently. Don’t answer on the basis of what worked or not – just whether or not you did it. Use these response choices. Try to rate each item separately in your mind from the others. Make your answers as true FOR YOU as you can. Circle the answer that best applies to you.

1 – not at all

2- somewhat

3= quite a hit

4= a great deal

1. Looked for a stronger connection with God.
2. Sought God’s love and care.
3. Sought help from God in letting go of my anger.
4. Tried to put my plans into action together with God.
5. Tried to see how God might be trying to strengthen me in this situation.
6. Asked forgiveness for my sins.
7. Focused on religion to stop worrying about my problems
8. Wondered whether God had abandoned me.
9. Felt punished by God for my lack of devotion.
10. Wondered what I did far God to punish me.
11. Questioned God’s love for me.
12. Wondered whether my church had abandoned me.
13. Decided the devil made this happen.
14. Questioned the power of God.